Developing a predatory journal finder: Innovations in safeguarding research quality

Wan Asiah binti Wan Muhamad Tahir (1) , Nor Hafiza Abd Samad (2) , Nor Hafiza Haron (2) , Fatimah Bibi Hamzah (2) , Anis Juanita Mohd Zainudin (2) , Rukhiyah Adnan (2) , Mohd Azahari Mohd Yusof (3)
(1) UPTM, Malaysia,
(2) Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia, Malaysia,
(3) Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Abstract

With the proliferation of Open Access journals and the shift to online publishing, academic publishing has changed dramatically. The number of journals has expanded significantly as the publishing business has evolved. There are currently more journals where authors can publish their work. With the numerous advantages of open-access publication for writers and readers, credible publishers are launching hundreds of new open-access journals. However, due to their increased popularity, less respectable journals have emerged, abusing the author-pay model and jeopardizing the integrity of published research. They do not adhere to academic publishing norms; they usually publish a paper quickly. Publishing research findings in such publications harms the writers and undermines public trust in scientific research. As a result, an application was developed to detect predatory journals, which will guide researchers in evaluating a journal or publisher. The apps will help users identify predatory publications and determine whether or not a journal is legitimate by checking databases such as SCOPUS and Web of Science. To accomplish the goal of this study, Beall's List and other lists of predatory publishers will be employed.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Aggarwal, A., Fojo, T., Chamberlain, C., Davis, C., & Sullivan, R. (2017). Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society?—lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund. Annals of Oncology, *28*(8), 1738-1750. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx110

Alrawadieh, Z. (2018). Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies. Tourism and Hospitality Research, *20*(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358418800121

Bairi, K., Fourtassi, M., Fatimy, R., & Kadmiri, N. (2023). Distance education as a tool to improve researchers' knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: The Moroccan experience. International Journal for Educational Integrity, *19*(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00122-7

Christopher, M., & Young, K. (2015). Awareness of "predatory" open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, *2*. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00022

Cobey, K., Grudniewicz, A., Lalu, M., Rice, D., Raffoul, H., & Moher, D. (2019). Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: A survey. BMJ Open, *9*(3), e026516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516

Cukier, S., Lalu, M., Bryson, G., Cobey, K., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2019). Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: A modified Delphi consensus process. https://doi.org/10.1101/19010850

Cukier, S., Lalu, M., Bryson, G., Cobey, K., Grudniewicz, A., & Moher, D. (2020). Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: A modified Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open, *10*(2), e035561. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561

Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE, *10*(6), e0127556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556

Gopalakrishna, G., Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J., & Bouter, L. (2021). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/vk9yt

Gurnani, B., & Kaur, K. (2021). Avoiding predatory publishing for early-career ophthalmologists. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, *69*(12), 3719–3725. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1639_21

Hastings, R., Labib, K., Lechner, I., Bouter, L., Widdershoven, G., & Evans, N. (2022). Guidance on research integrity provided by European discipline-specific learned societies: A scoping review. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/kn5y9

Jing, W., Halffman, W., & Zwart, H. (2020). The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges. Learned Publishing, *34*(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1326

Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, *31*(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150

Labib, K., & Evans, N. (2021). Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers. PLoS Biology, *19*(4), e3001036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

Mahomed, S., Loots, G., & Staunton, C. (2022). The role of data transfer agreements in ethically managing data sharing for research in South Africa. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.7196/sajbl.2022.v15i1.807

Richtig, G., Richtig, M., Hoetzenecker, W., Saxinger, W., Lange-Asschenfeldt, B., Steiner, A., ... & Richtig, E. (2018). Knowledge and influence of predatory journals in dermatology: A pan-Austrian survey. Acta Dermato Venereologica, *0*. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3037

Shrestha, J. (2021). Predatory journals as threats to academic publishing: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, *4*(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v4i2.33640

Shrestha, J., Subedi, S., Shokati, B., & Chaudhary, A. (2018). Predatory journals: A threat to scholarly publishing. Journal of Education and Research, *8*(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v8i1.25482

Swanberg, S., Thielen, J., & Bulgarelli, N. (2020). Faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory open access journals: A needs assessment study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, *108*(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.849

Yazdani, S., Akbarilakeh, M., Abdalla, M., Boelen, C., Arbabisarjou, A., & Moonaghi, H. (2019). Measuring social accountability of medical universities' education function - Design, development, and validation of instrument. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, *8*(26), 2110–2114. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2019/46

Authors

Wan Asiah binti Wan Muhamad Tahir
wanasiah@uptm.edu.my (Primary Contact)
Nor Hafiza Abd Samad
Nor Hafiza Haron
Fatimah Bibi Hamzah
Anis Juanita Mohd Zainudin
Rukhiyah Adnan
Mohd Azahari Mohd Yusof
Wan Asiah binti Wan Muhamad Tahir, Abd Samad, N. H. ., Haron, N. H. ., Hamzah, F. B., Mohd Zainudin, A. J., Adnan, R., & Mohd Yusof, M. A. (2024). Developing a predatory journal finder: Innovations in safeguarding research quality. Jurnal Evolusi , 5(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.61688/jev.v5i3.351

Article Details

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

No Related Submission Found