Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The International Journal of Communication and Media Studies (IJCMS) is dedicated to maintaining the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. All parties involved in the publication process—authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher—are expected to uphold these standards and prevent any form of publication malpractice.

Authors submitting to IJCMS affirm that their work is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under review in any other journal. They also confirm that the manuscript is free from plagiarism, properly cites all sources, and discloses any actual or potential conflicts of interest.


1. Duties of Editors

1.1 Decision on Publication

The Editor-in-Chief has the final responsibility for deciding which submitted manuscripts are accepted for publication. Decisions are made in accordance with the journal’s editorial policies, peer review reports, and applicable legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, and plagiarism.

1.2 Manuscript Evaluation

All submissions undergo an initial screening for originality using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts passing this stage are sent to at least two independent reviewers under a double-blind peer review process. Recommendations from reviewers guide the editorial decision to accept, revise, or reject.

1.3 Fair Play

Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on their scholarly merit, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political ideology.

1.4 Confidentiality

The editorial team must keep all details about submitted manuscripts strictly confidential, sharing information only with the corresponding author, reviewers, editorial board members, or the publisher as necessary.

1.5 Conflicts of Interest

Editors must not use unpublished information from submitted manuscripts for their own research without written permission from the authors.


2. Duties of Reviewers

2.1 Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Reviewers assist the editorial team in making publication decisions and may also help authors improve their manuscripts.

2.2 Promptness

If a reviewer feels unable to review a manuscript or cannot complete the review within the agreed time frame, they should inform the editor promptly.

2.3 Confidentiality

All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and not shared without authorization.

2.4 Objectivity

Reviews should be objective and constructive, avoiding personal criticism. Feedback must be supported by clear and reasoned arguments.

2.5 Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant works not cited by the authors and alert the editor to any substantial similarity or overlap with other publications they are aware of.

2.6 Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest with the authors, institutions, or funding bodies connected to the work.


3. Duties of Authors

3.1 Reporting Standards

Authors must present an accurate and objective account of their research. All data should be represented truthfully, and the manuscript should include sufficient detail for replication. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior.

3.2 Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide raw data during the review process and should retain such data for a reasonable period after publication.

3.3 Originality and Plagiarism

All manuscripts must be the authors’ original work. If using the work or words of others, authors must provide appropriate citation. The similarity index must be below 25% as determined by plagiarism detection software prior to peer review.

3.4 Multiple or Redundant Publication

Authors should not submit substantially similar work to more than one journal simultaneously. Doing so constitutes unethical publishing behavior.

3.5 Acknowledgement of Sources

Authors must give proper credit to all sources that have influenced their work.

3.6 Authorship Criteria

Only individuals who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study should be listed as authors. Others who contributed in a lesser capacity should be acknowledged.

3.7 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could influence the results or interpretation of the work.

3.8 Correction of Errors

If authors discover a significant error in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate to issue a correction or retraction.


4. Plagiarism Policy

IJCMS maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism. Any form of plagiarism, whether detected before or after publication, will result in manuscript rejection or article retraction. The journal uses plagiarism detection tools to ensure originality and integrity.


5. Commitment to Ethical Publishing

The International Journal of Communication and Media Studies actively promotes ethical publishing practices. We seek the advice of our editorial and reviewer boards to continually strengthen our safeguards against malpractice and ensure the integrity of the academic record.