Final-Year UPTM Undergraduates’ Attitudes Towards Technology In Learning English

Authors

  • Ida Zulaifa binti Salleh Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia
  • Nurhazlini Rahmat Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61688/jev.v6i2.481

Keywords:

Undergraduates, Technology, English Language Proficiency

Abstract

This study investigates final-year UPTM undergraduates’ attitudes towards technology in learning English. Technology has been widely used in education for effective learning, therefore, it is crucial to understand students’ attitudes towards it to develop better learning strategies. This research aims to identify what kind of technology is more sufficient for students in learning English and to investigate students’ attitudes towards using technology in learning English. A quantitative approach was conducted using a structured questionnaire distributed to 100 students across three facilities, where all of the programmes are for non-English majors. The data collected were analysed descriptively to measure the frequency and patterns of technology usage. The findings revealed that the majority of the students have positive attitudes towards technology, such as Google Translate, WhatsApp, TikTok, Duolingo, and Google Docs. However, digital tools with limited accessibility, such as Apple Pages, showed lower usage. These findings suggest that students are willing to use technology in learning English when the tools are practical, accessible, and aligned with their learning needs. This study concludes that fostering positive attitudes towards technology can enhance self-learning and effective language learning experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rauf, A., & Swanto, S. (2020). Attitudes and technology integration among ESL secondary school teachers in Sabah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.566

Ahchutan, S. (2021). The effectiveness of WhatsApp in enhancing English language proficiency among UTAR undergraduates (Undergraduate thesis). Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman. http://eprints.utar.edu.my/5220/1/fyp_ED_2021_SA.pdf

Akther, F. (2022). English for personal and career development and its importance for better employment opportunities. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies, 2(3), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v2i3.258

Akyürek, E. (2019). Impact of using technology on teacher–student communication/interaction: Improving students’ learning. World Journal of Education, 9(4), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p30

Albinson, P., Cetinkaya, D., & Oman, T. (2020). Using technology to enhance assessment and feedback: A framework for evaluating tools and applications. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference (pp. xx–xx). https://doi.org/10.1145/3383923.3383940

Al-Sharqi, L., & Abbasi, I. S. (2020). The influence of technology on English language and literature. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p1

Alvarez, J. C., Cuebillas, C. I., Solano, S. B., Sulana, J. M., Toledano, G. M., Cañeza, D. C. B., & Ocampo, D. M. (2024). Impact of TikTok application on the second language acquisition of Grade 10 students. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418203002

Amin, S. N. (2021). Gamification of Duolingo in rising students’ English language learning motivation. Lingua Scientia: Jurnal Bahasa, 13(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2021.13.2.191-213

Basak, S. K., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

Bharathi, D. M. U. (2023). Digital tools for teaching English: An effective and innovative way. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.34293/rtdh.v12iS1-Dec.47

Binhammad, M. H. Y., Othman, A., Abuljadayel, L., Al Mheiri, H., Alkaabi, M., & Almarri, M. (2024). Investigating how generative AI can create personalized learning materials tailored to individual student needs. Creative Education, 15(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.157091

Brooker, D. (2018). English for development: A review of research into the role of English as a driver for socio-economic development. Cambridge Assessment English. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/539681-perspectives-english-for-development.pdf

Carmi, G. (2024). E-learning using Zoom: A study of students’ attitude and learning effectiveness in higher education. Heliyon, 10(4), e30229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30229

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Farhan, H. N. (2025). The role of AI ChatGPT in English language education: Benefits, challenges, and future perspectives. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15874.18886

Ghafar, Z. N., & Mohamedamin, A. A. (2022). The role of technology and e-learning process in English language teaching from schools to universities: A review of literature. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(6), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v2i6.75

Gottschalk, F., Schleicher, A., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries. OECD Publishing. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/WKP(2023)14/en/pdf

Haddock, G., & Maio, G. R. (n.d.). Attitudes: Content, structure and functions. Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/hewstonesocialpsychology/chapters/cpt6.pdf

Iman, R., Fatima, A., Salem, I. E., & Allil, K. (2023). Teaching and learning delivery modes in higher education: Looking back to move forward post-COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100805

Jannah, E. I., & Hentasmaka, D. (2021). The use of Discord application in virtual English learning: Students’ perceptions. Premise Journal of English Education, 10(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v10i2.4168

Khasawneh, O. Y. (2022). Technophobia: Is it part of the problem or the solution? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085398

Kim, G., & Bae, J. (2020). Students’ use of digital English learning strategies in tertiary education. Teaching English with Technology, 20(1), 21–42. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1242644.pdf

Masalimova, A. R., Zheltukhina, M. R., Sergeeva, O. V., Sizova, Z. M., Novikov, P. N., & Sadykova, A. R. (2024). Exploring higher education students’ attitudes toward e-learning after COVID-19. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14045

McCombes, S. (2019). Sampling methods: Types, techniques & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/sampling-methods/

Mohamad, F., Asnawi, M. L., Abdul Kadir, Z., & Darmi, R. (2022). Students’ perceptions towards the drawbacks of technology in English language teaching and learning. International Journal of Social Science Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v10i2.19810

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Ida Zulaifa binti Salleh, & Rahmat, N. (2025). Final-Year UPTM Undergraduates’ Attitudes Towards Technology In Learning English. Jurnal Evolusi , 6(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.61688/jev.v6i2.481

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.